AWARENESS TIMES
Sierra Leone News & Information

State House | Press Union | Lumley Beach | AllAfrica | SL-Web

www.awarenesstimes.com

  Giving Knowledge to the People
welcome to sierra leone's premier news source
Last Updated: Jul 17th, 2012 - 17:22:19 
Front Page 
 
 NEWS
 Breaking News
 Local News
 Politics
 Photo News
 Video News
 
 EDITORIALS
 
 FROM OUR TEAM
 
 COMMENTS & OPINIONS
 Moiie's Column
 
 SPECIAL REPORTS
 Afsatu Kabba
 
 FEATURES
 
 ENTERTAINMENT
 
 PROFILES
 Role Models
 Awareness Lady
 Common Man
 
 THE ECONOMY
 
 NOTICES & DOCUMENTS
 Special Messages
 Legal Matters
 Obituaries
 
 PAID SUPPLEMENTS
 
 ADVERTISEMENTS
 
 SATIRE
Search


Published online by
Sylvia Blyden Dot Com

17 Garrison Street,
Freetown,
Sierra Leone.
Tel: +232-77-772001
Tel: +232-88-321000
Tel: +232-76-350077
Tel: +232-30-321001
Email:
editor@awarenesstimes.com
Website:
www.awarenesstimes.com

COMMENTS & OPINIONS  

Collective Responsibility: A Sick Excuse for Multiple Judicial Murders at the hands of SLPPís Julius Maada Bio et al
By John Lansana Musa Esq.
Jul 17, 2012, 17:04
Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Collective Responsibility is a Cabinet Convention dating back to the 19th century. The Constitution of Sierra Leone refers to it thus:


ďThe Cabinet shall be collectively responsible to Parliament for any advice given to the President by or under the general authority of the Cabinet and for all things done by or under the authority of any Minister in the execution of his office, Section 60. (1).Ē


What is more, the Sierra Leone Government Notes on Cabinet Procedure, include the Doctrine of Collective Responsibility that is in conformity with that found across the Commonwealth nations in letter and spirit.

The want of knowledge on this doctrine compounded by loose reasoning has often led to extra-logical considerations in discussions of Government by even well-meaning compatriots eager to shoot a quarry in an opposition political party. The following discussion arises from Candidate Julius Maada Bioís tenuous understanding of this doctrine.


Let us go to the discussion now. The thing to keep in mind when discussing the doctrine of collective responsibility is this: Acceptance of ministerial office means accepting collective responsibility for Government decision-making. Decisions reached by the Cabinet or Ministerial Committees are binding on all members of Government. Once Cabinet makes a decision, Ministers must support it regardless of personal views and whether or not they were at the meeting concerned.

 

The term, collective responsibility has been loosely used by some Sierra Leoneans to assess the assertions of Julius Maada Bio on the question of allegations of Extra-Judicial Executions of 29 fellow Sierra Leoneans. The context in which Maada Bio defends his position on the grave question is misleading and contrary to the Collective Responsibility Convention.

 

Counterposing allegations by his accusers of the extra-judicial murders, he retorts that he was not individually involved. The notion that one conjoins in collective responsibility while having a point of departure that he was not involved is incongruous to this doctrine. This supposition is specious and perverts the doctrine.


When one accepts collective responsibility, you must remain quiet and support the proposition or defend it on pain of resignation or dismissal by Government. Julius Maada Bioís assumption of collective responsibility will have little weight with those who can properly estimate the mischief in the ambivalence of being against an action while also supporting it.

 

This point has escaped the notice of Julius Maada Bio and his obsequious supporters. Geoffrey Marshall, an authority on Government has written that the convention is underscored by the unanimity principle which professes that: a minister must not vote against government policy. Thus, Julius Maada Bio cannot say, ďthe NPRC Boys killed those people, I did not kill anybody, but I support their extra-judicial murder.Ē


In short, conjoining in collective responsibility takes place when decision making is taking place contemporaneously by Cabinet or an absent or new Minister must adopt the policy already made unless he or she is prepared to resign or be sacked. Julius Maada Bio was advised of the proposition to kill 29 people or should have had reason to know as he was third in command in the NPRC hierachy. Did he assume collective responsibility then or later on the morrow of 29 innocent people dead?

 

Moreover, unanimity of Cabinet members is the fundamental kernel of Collective Responsibility - that all members of the government speak and vote together in Cabinet except in situations where the Cabinet makes an exception such as a free vote or an Ďagreement to differí. (Geoffrey Marshall, Ministerial responsibility, (1989) pp 2-4).


There are exceptions to the Doctrine in certain instances. Normal principles of collective responsibility with regard to ministerial unanimity may be suspended where the Ďfree voteí (or Ďopen questioní) and the Ďagreement to differí are in place.


One of these exceptions is the permission of Free Votes on questions in Cabinet. Free votes are invariably recognized in issues of conscience, for example social, moral or religious questions such as capital punishment, abortion or gay rights among other things.


Another exception referred to by scholars is the agreement to differ. They have argued, that an agreement to differ is itself a collective Cabinet decision in which a split between fellow ministers is not a breach of collective responsibility, but an exercise and product of it.

 

Cabinet practice of free votes and agreements to differ have not yet germinated in our democracy and would have been unheard of in the tempestuous and heedless military regime subsisting from 1992 to 1996. Contrary to the Collective Responsibility Convention and its exceptions stated above, Julius Maada Bio has carved out his own notion of the doctrine to escape culpability for the extra-judicial murders. Accordingly, his notion of the convention is at odds with the normative principles of the doctrine. The excuse pales in truth of the doctrine.

 

A fortiori, Julius Maada Bio, is saying, I accept the policy of the NPRC killing of 29 innocent people including a pregnant woman, but I was not one of the killers who shed their blood without due process of the law and I apologize for it retrospectively when confounded by wailing widows and children of those killed in the offing of a watershed election.

 

If we entertain the fallacy nurtured by Julius Maada Bio as a fig leaf to cover abuse of human rights, and that he took no part in the mass murder of Sierra Leoneans, but accepts collective responsibility fashioned by the NPRC, to order the homicide of innocent people, then he does not understand this doctrine at all. For Ivor Jennings in Cabinet Government, 1965, p.277, says:


ďA minister must not speak against government policyĒ.
He asserts that: ďa minister who is not prepared to defend a Cabinet decision must, therefore, resign.Ē

 

Before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Julius Maada Bio never testified that he tendered his resignation or the NPRC High Command offered him a free vote or an agreement to differ with his colleagues on grounds of being a conscientious objector to extra-judicial killing of 29 people roused at dawn to die for nothing.


In essence, Julius Maada Bioís subscription to Collective Responsibility is a clear public expression of a ministerís support for a government decision regardless of that ministerís personal opinion or his non-involvement in the matter. Hence, Bioís dissenting vote if any, would have led to immediate dismissal if there were no voluntary resignation.

 

Apart from resignation emerging from dissent on policy, did Julius Maada Bio abstain from the execution of the decision to kill 29 persons when the matter was first mooted? Experts on Government say that in general, an abstention should lead to the same consequences, as maintenance of the doctrine is said to require not just the absence of dissent but the expression of positive support.


Since there is no evidence that Julius Maada Bio, expressed dissentience, abstained or was offered a free vote or an agreement to differ by the NPRC High Command in the prelude of the order to kill, his acceptance of collective responsibility is tantamount to an expression of positive support for Extra-Judicial killings of 29 innocent Sierra Leoneans.


By John Lansana Musa Esq. (First published 7th June 2012)

TITLE & CONTENT HAS BEEN SLIGHTLY CHANGED BY THIS NEWSPAPER.


© Copyright by Awareness Times Newspaper in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
NEWS
Sierra Leone Women do not wish to be left out as Women are moving from the kitchens & bedrooms to positions of POWER
Outgoing Chairman Of WAMZ Committee Of Governors Calls For Coordinated Action On Monetary Union
In Africa, Football to be used in Fight against Malaria
EDITORIALS
Mr. Maada Bio Trusts Dr. Christiana Thorpe, Period!
Poor Communications in Sierra Leone
Telecommunications Visitors arrive to state of APC Dombolo @ NATCOM Rubbish!
FROM OUR TEAM
Sierra Leone: A Response to Dr. Thomas Yormahís Penultimate Communication
Sama Banya wants Awareness Times to call Tom Nyuma a Buffoon
Too Smart to be Distracted - Sorry Guys but it is Squirrel Question Time
COMMENTS & OPINIONS
Collective Responsibility: A Sick Excuse for Multiple Judicial Murders at the hands of SLPPís Julius Maada Bio et al
Sierra Leone Krios around the world Console President Koroma
Using TRC Report to Respond to George Khoryama : A Dangerous Tribalist is LYING again; But thank God for those Sacred TRUTHS in Truth & Reconciliation Commission Report
SPECIAL REPORTS
Violence & Disenfranchisement as 871 Voted out of 6,184 Registered in Sierra Leone's Bye Elections
Africa Confidential on Sierra Leone - Maada Bio Overthrew Strasser and Marketwomen Chased Bio from Power (16 Years Ago)
Libel against the Blydens: Philip Neville ďRepliesĒ
FEATURES
Judge Orders for Sorious Samura to be Brought Back
A SIERRA LEONEAN HONORED BY THE AMERICAN RED CROSS
Life is not Static; Over time, Journalists will agree and disagree on various issues
ENTERTAINMENT
Watch Sierra Leone Television Live on TV-Africa for 5 Euros/monthly
In Sierra Leone, Emmerson Commends Tejan Kabbah
PROFILES
No articles available.
THE ECONOMY
No articles available.
NOTICES & DOCUMENTS
TEGLOMA Consoles President Ernest Bai Koroma on loss of mother
Opening Statement by Commissioner Jamesina King on 16th July 2012 in Bumbuna, Tonkolili District, Northern Province of Sierra Leone
Some more Tributes and Condolence Messages on death of Mrs. Alice Koroma
PAID SUPPLEMENTS
Sierra Leone Judgment against MILLICENT LEWIS-OJUMU (nee HAMILTON-HAZELEY), Dr. PAUL CHIY & CLAS LEGAL LTD.
BBC Media Action seeks to strengthen production team in Sierra Leone (Job Opportunities)
Sierra Leonean Woman Dies at the Age of 105 Years
ADVERTISEMENTS
Office of the President's Chief of Staff seeks Reconciler for EITI Report
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDDING OF OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BLOCKS IN SIERRA LEONE
ĎU wan buy...? U wan sell...? - Sierra Leoneís first Sales/Ads website launched
SATIRE
As Bio Launches Manifesto, Concerned Citizens ask: How Can a Squirrel like Julius Maada Bio Talk about Corruption in Sierra Leone?
Na Da We Passport! A Sierra Leone Political Satire
QUOTABLE QUOTE: - ERNEST BAI KOROMA TO THE TRC. (5th August 2003)

Copyright © 2005 - 2010, Awareness Times Sierra Leone; All Rights Reserved.
Hosted & Designed by West Africa Dot Net